A bipartisan group of city leader referred to as the Climate Mayors released a joint letter today imploring the EPA never to repeal the Clean Power Plan, a move they warn would damage public health, climate initiatives, and efforts to combat climate change.
The band of civic leader, 233 mayors from 46 states and territories representing 51 million Americans, released the joint letter, set to coincide with an EPA listening session set to occur tomorrow in Kansas City, Missouri. Mayors from Boston, Dallas, Chicago, Denver, La, New York, San francisco bay area, along with a huge selection of others, have signed the letter.
The cities argue that, as the centers of commerce and populace, they are on the front lines of climate change. The Clean Power Plan is crucial to get government at every level to collaborate to mitigate and adapt to climate change.
In addition to cutting pollution from power plants and transportation, the mayors argue that the price of inaction against climate change is too high. The letter states that the annual price for coastal storm damage is likely to climb to $ 35 billion by the 2030s.
This collective action comes at a time when cities are increasing taking the lead in the climate change battle in america. Cities have pledged in which to stay the Paris Climate Accords, transition to renewable power, and interact as an organization to push more environmentally sustainable policies.
“The nearly 400 members of the Climate Mayors ne2rk have already begun to implement policies to operate a vehicle emission reductions and address adaptation concerns in their cities, ” says Sarah King, a project manager for the Climate Mayors group. “I think that this mayoral focus on effective climate policies will keep on regardless of whether or not the Clean Power Plan is actually repealed. “
King points to plans for collective action, such as for example procuring electric vehicles for city fleets, the mayors are already likely to undertake.
But without federal assistance, the road to climate change mitigation become much more difficult.
“[W]e can’;t act alone, ” the statement says. “We need the federal government to supply a path forward to making meaningful reductions in carbon pollution while finding your way through the impacts of climate change. ”
The letter explains why the Clean Power Plan is so crucial to local plans to combat pollution and reduce carbon emissions:
Reducing greenhouse gas emissions is vital to protect our citizens contrary to the worst impacts of climate change. A peer reviewed study conducted by EPA projected stark differences between a world in the year 2100 where worldwide warming averages 2 degrees Celsius—a goal for which the Clean Power Plan is critical—and one in which worldwide warming averages 4 degrees Celsius: 57, 000 fewer domestic deaths per year because of poor quality of air; 12, 000 fewer domestic deaths each year from extreme heat and cold in 49 U. S. cities; up to $ 6. 4 billion in avoided annual adaptation costs from severe precipitation in 50 U. S. cities; $ 3. 1 billion in avoided annual damages and adaptation costs from sea level rise and storm surge on the coasts; or more to $ 2 . 5 billion in avoided damages from inland flooding.